"Landep News"
Europe is the cancer, Islam is the answer
As police re-interviewed Breivik, they found out that he was also planning on attacking the royal palace, seen as a symbol for all Norwegians, and offices of the Labor party because of its multicultural policies.
The fact that Breivik saw the Labor party as promoter of multicultural policies and consequently as a target rises questions about the multicultural policies all across Europe, for the entire continent is embracing this philosophy of multiculturalism, whether it belongs to the European Union or not.
The first important thing that is to be remembered when speaking of multiculturalism in Europe is that Norway is in no way related to the multicultural policies of the European Union, since it is not part of the continental organization.
Multiculturalism
Transferred to the political context, multiculturalism means equality of status to distinct ethnic groups without promoting a specific group above the others.
There are entire societies built on multiculturalism, the United States, Canada or Australia being some of the most successful examples of societies that were able to find common grounds on which to build nations in spite of the multiple differences.
However, in Europe the model seems to be failing, if we are to look at the declarations made earlier in the year by highest profile figures of European Union leadership.
Thus, there was an entire scandal in Germany, when Prime Minister Angela Merkel said in October 2010 that multiculturalism was dead in Germany, and that its efforts to integrate immigrants “failed totally.”
In February 2011, President of France Nicolas Sarkozy said that in his opinion multiculturalism failed.
Sarkozy made this statement in an interview on national television, saying that “we must respect differences, but we don’t want a society where communities coexist.” He explained that when someone came to France he/she must blend in the community that is France, and if that community were rejected then the person would no longer be accepted in France.
He went even further to say that the French national community does not want to change lifestyle, the equality of genders, the right of girls to go to school and so on.
Islam in France
David Cameron said at the beginning of the year that multiculturalism was a failure, and called for better integration of the young Muslim in order to avoid conflict with the European extremists.
Similar appreciations were made by Spanish PM Jose Maria Aznar, and even by former Australian PM John Howard, who complained about the same thing.
There are two clear reasons the multiculturalism cannot work in Europe the same way it does work in the United States, for example.
Europe is a continent composed of various cultures and historical backgrounds, and the people of the continent are not even close to ready to accept the milder differences between them and other European nations, let alone totally different cultures and religious.
For centuries, Europeans were taught and felt like they were the supreme culture in the world, and that makes it hard for most of them to accept that their culture is just another one among many in the world.
Multiculturalism in America was built by means of decades of living together in the same country, and at the end of many conflicts that shaped the way the Americans see the common life in their country for all the people.
It took the secession war, the abuses of KKK, the prosecution of the black, the attitude toward the Japanese during the WWII and many other sad episodes in the American history until people understood the benefits of living together in peace.
The people who come to Europe are, for the most of them, economic immigrants who come to a rich continent in hope of a better life.
That is sure to create a perception from the Europeans, like the misconception that they come to steal the jobs of the Europeans, which is mainly not true given that most of the jobs they do are those Europeans refuse to do.
There are people who come from cultures that place no emphasize on moral values, and consequently they commit acts that go against the law of the countries they come to, thus making the process of acceptance much more difficult.
The most part of the immigrants that come to Europe and enter conflict with its values are from Muslim tradition. Europe has a long history of fighting the Muslims, since the invasion of the Iberian Peninsula onward to the famous assault on Vienna in the 17th century and up until the religious wars in former Yugoslavia.
Future Scenario for Europe
The moral imperatives and even the religious feeling are deeply imprinted in the European heart, although most of the citizens of the continent live after a self-made code of values.
It is not difficult to understand then that when a community of Muslims establishes itself on a territory that still bears the mark of the Christian civilization problems could emerge.
Multiculturalism demands that both Christian and Muslim live together in the same communities in peace. What happens then when the bells of the church are being silenced because they “disturb the order” and “are an insult to the Muslim citizens” of the community, while the Muslim muezzins are allowed to call for prayer in loud voice from the minarets of the mosques?
What happens when the crucifixes are being taken out of school classes and students are expressly forbidden to wear Christian symbols in school because they disturb the same Muslim citizens, and the unbelievers?
What happens when the cross sign on the national flags is irritating the same Muslim citizens of the European multicultural society?
How far can multicultural positive discrimination can go before it is interpreted as clear abuse on the legal rights of the majority?
What happens when some of the Islamic citizens reject every single value of the Western civilization and express their clear desire to turn the countries where they live into Muslim lands?
The greatest fear of many citizens in Europe is that the growing number of Muslims and the laws on immigration that allow the growing of this number even further will one day see Europe run by Islam.
This fear is expressed on the internet through entire websites that create scenarios about how the continent will be overrun by Muslim people. Some of the Muslim people don’t help at all, since they express themselves in public, saying that Muslims will rule the world and other slogans like this.
The Muslim population is not the only one that proves the European way of multiculturalism ineffective.
France expelled all the Roma population that was in the great cities of the country to the countries of origin, most of them in Eastern Europe. They were given some money and were left in the care of nations that have their own problems to deal with.
How did multiculturalism work on these people? How did the Roma population itself manifest the will to be integrated into society? Is sending them away a form of asserting multiculturalism?
There are communities in Europe that still abide by the biblical teachings. How is multiculturalism promoted when these people are practically forced by a very powerful lobby to accept as “sexual diversity” something that their religion calls as sin? Would it not be enough to ask them to be tolerant of the people next to them, in stead of asking them to consider the people of these communities as perfectly normal, when the religious teaching compels them to beg to differ? Wouldn’t be more effective to have a legislation preventing all sorts of abuse against such communities without making attempts to teach the other people that they are wrong about them?
The examples could go on for even and all teach that if there is a failure, it is not of multiculturalism itself but of the political correctness that has pushed the limits beyond acceptance, creating a dangerous tension among the majority of the population.
Radicalism
Europe is right now the most striking example of political and social schizophrenia, as the political propaganda of the European Union speaks of tearing down the walls between the 27 nations of the continental state (ever since the Lisbon Treaty it is a state like any others), while the people in the ground, in the national societies, raise more and more such walls that separate them from the others.
Even if we accept the diagnosis of the French president and other political leaders that multiculturalism is dead, a question still must be answered: What next?
What will happen next to the millions of Muslim already living on European territory? Will they be deported? Will they be protected somehow? Will their lives go on unchallenged?
What will happen to the Roma population? They don’t have anywhere to be deported since Eastern Europe is already part of the European Union, and the Roma’s deportation will have to be dealt with sooner or later by the same authorities that now push them toward the limes?
What will happen to the multiculturalism which stands at the very fabric of the European Union, which is in essence a joint venture of 27 countries that speak 27 languages, share three major branches of the same religion (which have been for centuries in conflict)?
If the European Union is to stand a chance to survive, some sort of multiculturalism must be found, but probably one that will go as far as teaching the others to accept their differences not to embrace them. It will probably have do be a multiculturalism where being a majority member is not a fault, as it is now, but a solid ground on which to build.
Thank's for link:
0 Response to "Europe is the cancer, Islam is the answer"
Post a Comment