By Kyriakos Parpounas
I have recently spoken about the difference between corporate
philanthropy and corporate social responsibility (CSR). I specifically
mentioned that all acts of corporate philanthropy are welcomed social
activities, but they are certainly not core CSR actions. A concrete
example of the difference between the two is the latest court case
against executive members of the former Cyprus Popular Bank. Without
disputing the presumption of innocence of these executives or their
right to a fair trial, there is no doubt that certain bank executives
and the overall organisation violated business ethics and the principles
of responsible entrepreneurship in a number of cases. The case
highlights the extended responsibilities of executives working in large
organisations, or in socially important organisations such as banks.
I use the example of the Popular Bank because it was perhaps the
pioneer of corporate philanthropy during its boom years. They offered
contributions to various social groups, embraced and expanded the
radio-marathon, the largest charity action in Cyprus, and made their
name largely synonymous with organised charity.
I am sure if we went back to the bank’s communications at the time,
we would find a series of reports showing these actions were in the
framework of the bank’s CSR. This demonstrates that the bank’s
executives had a completely wrong understanding of their obligations to
the community. They considered these as an obligation to return
something to society in the form of charity, but did not appreciate that
their foremost obligation was to protect the community from poor and
irresponsible business practices.
In recent years the CSR concept has been standardised by various
organisations around the world. In 2004, after two years of discussions,
the International Standards Organisation (ISO) published an
international standard for CSR.
This lasted until November 2010, when the ISO 26000 Standard was
issued. Called the “Guide on Social Responsibility” it has a substantial
difference from previous standards issued by the ISO. The ISO 26000 is
an advisory and not mandatory standard, providing a guiding framework
rather than a certified management system. It attempts to clarify what
constitutes CSR and how it can be integrated into everyday business
practice. The stakeholders of an organisation should be defined by the
relationship of CSR to sustainable development and is based on seven
core principles.
These principles are: accountability, transparency, ethical
behaviour, respect for stakeholder interests, respect for the rule of
law, respect for international norms of behaviour and respect for human
rights.
As part of defining the limits of its social responsibility, each
undertaking is required to focus on the following key issues:
organisational governance, human rights, labour practices, the
environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues and community
involvement and development.
It is clear that the standard is wide-ranging and touches in a
coherent manner upon the need to respect both the financial results of
firms, the interests of people (employees, partners, customers,
consumers, local communities and society at large) and those of the
planet (the environmental impact of the business, etc).
If businesses do not manage to incorporate the basic principles of
CSR in their daily operation, we will continue to have examples similar
to that of the former Popular Bank, where the showcase might be
stunning, but the content is insufficient, socially analgesic and,
depending on the extent of the social impact of a business failure,
potentially dangerous.
The use of the guidance standard ISO 26000, as the basis for
identifying the responsibilities of a business, but especially for the
design of a coherent strategy to undertake such responsibilities, is a
good starting point on the way to improve business ethics and develop
more sustainable entrepreneurship.
Kyriakos Parpounas is director general of Green Dot (Cyprus) Public Co Ltd
Kyriakos Parpounas is director general of Green Dot (Cyprus) Public Co Ltd
Thank's for link:
http://cyprus-mail.com/2016/01/10/business-ethics-not-just-a-virtue-but-a-necessity/
-->
0 Response to "Corporate social responsibility"
Post a Comment