Dave Hodges
Second, the conflict would have to be a well-coordinated nuclear attack which would combine the United States nuclear fire power derived from the three sources: (1) Deep space platforms; (2) Bot hardened silos and mobile misslie launcher that are land based; and, (3) A devastating attack from the entire submarine fleet.
The coming war will largely feature what pundits call the BRIC nations and the USA and her allies. Each side of this coming conflict possesses widely divergent military strengths, weaknesses and strategies.
The US Is Dependent On a Devastating First Strike Attack
The United States and her allies have a decided advantage of quick strike, long range battlefield capabilities because of superior aircraft and carrier strike capabilities. The BRIC nations have an advantage with manpower, rocket propelled weapons and tanks.
The USA and her allies cannot win a sustained battlefield campaign because of the attrition factor. At the end of the day, America will be dependent on a successful nuclear first strike if it has any hope of prevailing in a World War III scenario.
The Chinese have demonstrated the ability to negate the United States Navy's technological advantage through the use of killer satellites. Therefore, the entire US strategy is predicated on a first strike before the Chinese can destroy the majority of the eyes and ears of the US military, namely its superior satellite capabilities in which the US forces can quickly locate and destroy the enemy with its smart weapons before the enemy knows what hit them.
Nuclear Submarines Are the “X Factor”
America’s “X Factor”
The BRICS cannot run or hide from this devastating weapon.
Nuclear submarines are often looked at as the great equalizer. No matter who is winning on the ground, in the air and on the surface of the oceans, the submarine force has the capability to reign down unimaginable destruction upon their enemy.
In the case of submarines, the USA and her allies are matched by their BRIC counterparts. Most subs carry eight nuclear missiles, each capable of destroying a major city.
The USA presumably has superior evasive techniques and therefore, would presumably survive sub-killer strategies with greater frequency that their BRIC adversaries. Therefore, the BRIC nations might win every land battle; however, the victorious BRIC nations would not have many of its cities left to return to in the case of a nuclear war.
The US submarines are, in effect, a formidable doomsday weapon. My military sources state that although Russia has improved itse nuclear submarine force, it still has not sufficiently closed the gap to offset this American advantage.
The Trigger Event
I have been writing for three years that the trigger event would occur in Syria and recent events, with Russia engaging in military attacks upon the US backed ISIS and other Syria rebel forces, are moving the world in the ultimate direction of World War III.
Devastating first strike capability.
The Tale of the Tape: The BRICS vs. the USA and Her Allies
BRIC Nations Conventional Military Strength
When
one compares the relative strengths of both sides, the BRICS hold a
decided advantage in any conventional conflict. And the difference is
growing more significant by the day as Obama is reducing the size of the
US military to pre-World War II levels while our enemies are increasing
both their equipment and troop strength.
Most Likely to Fight
Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Rockets
Russia 766,000 3,082 1,550 1 62 3,781
China 2,825,000 2,788 9,150 1 69 1,770
India 1,325,000 1,785 3,569 2 17 292
Total 4,916, 000 7,655 14,269 4 148 5,843
(NOTE: The forces of North Korea would be absorbed by China;
Ukraine and Belarus have a combined military strength of 200,000 men)
USA Allied Nations Conventional Military Strength
Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Rockets
USA 1,430,000 13,685 8,325 10 72 1,330
UK 205,330 900 400 1 11 60
FR 230,000 1,200 420 1 10 60
GRM 180,000 710 410 0 4 250
TURK 410,500 990 3,660 0 14 650
S KOR 640,000 1,400 2,350 0 14 250
JAP 250,000 1,600 770 1 16 100
TOT 3,345,830 20,475 8,325 13 141 2,700
Source: Global Fire Power
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: BRIC NATIONS VS USA & ALLIES
The
downside of a nuclear first strike by the United States would be that
the US would also take a significant beating as Russian and probable
Chinese and Indian nuclear forces would have time to retaliate. However,
the US submarines could do much of the damage because of geographical
proximity before our enemies could get many of their missles off the
launching pads.
If
the deep space platform missiles were successful along with the rods
from God in targeting Russian and Chinese nuclear submarines, the United
States could win a decisive victory. Although, without hardening our
power grid infrastructure against an EMP attack, the US could lose its grid and along with it 90% of the people within two years according to the Naval War College.
Does Obama show any signs of protecting the power grid? Does he show any signs of standing up to Russian incursions into Syria?
It
is not likely that a well-coordinated and simultaneous attack could be
launched without the leadership of the DOD which is under the control of
the President who shows no sign of mounting a resistance. With this
type of 'leadership', America will be thrust into a World War of
attrition which we will lose and lose badly.
Meanwhile,
the psychopathic banksters who have perpetuated this scenario will be
safely tucked away in the deep underground bunkers.
Likely refuge for the elite psychopathic banksters.
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2015/10/this-is-americas-only-chance-of-winning-world-war-iii-2458578.html
Thank's for link:
-->
0 Response to "The United States having any chance to win World War III"
Post a Comment